[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [riminilug-general] Raid 1

To: <riminilug-general@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <rocco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [riminilug-general] Raid 1
From: "Gianfranco Bartolini" <gbartolini@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 13:44:45 +0200
Delivered-to: battarsa@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: mailing list riminilug-general@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <200406171248.16974.rocco@rimini.no-ip.com>
List-help: <mailto:riminilug-general-help@riminilug.it>
List-post: <mailto:riminilug-general@riminilug.it>
List-subscribe: <mailto:riminilug-general-subscribe@riminilug.it>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:riminilug-general-unsubscribe@riminilug.it>
Mailing-list: contact riminilug-general-help@xxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
Reply-to: riminilug-general@xxxxxxxxxxxx

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniele Palumbo [mailto:rocco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 12:48 PM
> 
> invece un fs replicato (ovviamente via rete), per avere alta 
> affidabilità?
> 
> differenze da un "raid" di rete?
> sw?

Lo stavo per chiedere io :)

Saluti
G.Bartolini
Linux User #333064

References:
- Re: [riminilug-general] Raid 1
  - From: Daniele Palumbo

Prev by Date: Re: [riminilug-general] Raid 1
Next by Date: Re: [riminilug-general] Raid 1
Previous by thread: Re: [riminilug-general] Raid 1
Next by thread: Re: [riminilug-general] Raid 1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread